Cold Email Statistics 2026: Reply Rates, Follow-ups, Bounce Rates and Timing
The typical cold email sender earned a reply from 0.74% of the people they contacted in 2026, about one reply per 135 contacts, according to Smartlead data on more than 850 million emails. The top 10% of senders reached 2.63%. Belkins, which counts replies per email sent rather than per contact, measured an average of 0.45% across 7.5 million B2B cold emails in 2025. Follow-ups matter: steps 2 to 6 of a sequence brought in 58.6% of Belkins replies. Gong found the average rep needs 344 cold emails to land one meeting.
Key statistics
- The typical cold email sender earned a reply from 0.74% of contacts in 2026, about one reply per 135 contacts, according to Smartlead.
- B2B cold emails had an average reply rate of 0.45% in 2025, according to Belkins.
- Follow-up emails, steps 2 to 6, brought in 58.6% of all B2B cold email replies in 2025, according to Belkins.
- The typical cold email sender had a bounce rate of 1.54% in 2026, according to Smartlead.
- The average sales rep sent 344 cold emails to land one meeting, according to a 2025 Gong analysis of 28 million+ cold emails.
Cold email reply rate benchmarks
Two vendors publish free reply rate benchmarks with a stated sample. Smartlead reports percentiles across its senders. Belkins reports one average across its own client campaigns.
Most cold emails get no answer. The median Smartlead sender earned a reply from 0.74% of contacts, so it took about 135 people to get one reply. The top 10% needed 38 contacts and the top 5% needed 26. The bottom 10% needed 625 or more. By our calculation the top 5% reply rate is at least 24 times the bottom 10%. The gap between senders is far larger than any gap between days, hours or email lengths further down this page.
Belkins measured a lower number, 0.45% across 2025. That works out to about 219 emails per reply, from 34,393 replies on 7,530,489 emails. Part of the gap with Smartlead is the denominator. Belkins divides replies by every email sent, so each follow-up adds to the bottom of the fraction. Smartlead divides by contacts, so each person counts once. Belkins also notes that its earlier studies divided by people who opened, which is why its older figures looked much higher.
Reply rates moved during the year. Belkins saw a peak of 0.54% in February 2025 and a low of 0.35% in December, a fall of 35% by our calculation. Smartlead says its median held between 123 and 147 contacts per reply from month to month, with no seasonal easing. Saleshandy also publishes a cold email benchmark with a much higher average, but its stated data period is inconsistent and we could not archive the current edition, so we left it out. For a wider view of selling, see our sales statistics.
Source: Belkins, What are B2B cold email response rates? (June 2026). 7,530,489 emails sent in 2025. Reply rate is unique replies divided by emails sent.
-
The typical cold email sender earned a reply from 0.74% of contacts in 2026, about one reply per 135 contacts, according to Smartlead.
-
Cold email senders in the top 25% reached a reply rate of 1.43% or more in 2026, or 70 contacts per reply, according to Smartlead.
-
The top 10% of cold email senders earned a reply every 38 contacts in 2026, a 2.63% reply rate, according to Smartlead.
-
The top 5% of cold email senders reached a 3.85% reply rate in 2026, or 26 contacts per reply, according to Smartlead.
-
The bottom 10% of cold email senders had a reply rate of 0.16% or lower in 2026, needing 625 or more contacts per reply, according to Smartlead.
-
A typical cold email sender would earn about 7 replies per 1,000 contacts in 2026, against about 26 for the top 10%, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Smartlead data.
How we calculated it: Median reply rate 0.74% x 1,000 = 7.4 replies. Top 10% cutoff 2.63% x 1,000 = 26.3 replies.
-
Top 5% cold email senders had a reply rate 24 times that of the bottom 10% in 2026, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Smartlead data.
How we calculated it: Top 5% cutoff 3.85% divided by bottom 10% cutoff 0.16%: 3.85 / 0.16 = 24.1. The bottom 10% figure is a ceiling (0.16% or lower), so the true gap is at least this large.
-
B2B cold emails had an average reply rate of 0.45% in 2025, according to Belkins.
-
B2B cold email campaigns needed about 219 emails to earn one reply in 2025, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Belkins data.
How we calculated it: 7,530,489 emails sent divided by 34,393 replies = 219.0 emails per reply. The exact reply rate is 34,393 / 7,530,489 = 0.457%, which Belkins rounds to 0.45%.
-
B2B cold email reply rates peaked at 0.54% in February 2025, according to Belkins.
-
B2B cold email reply rates fell to a low of 0.35% in December 2025, according to Belkins.
-
B2B cold email reply rates averaged 0.50% in the first half of 2025 and 0.40% in the second half, according to Belkins.
-
B2B cold email reply rates fell 35% from February to December 2025, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Belkins data.
How we calculated it: February 0.54%, December 0.35%. (0.54 - 0.35) / 0.54 = 0.352, or 35%.
-
Smartlead's typical cold email reply rate in 2026 was 1.6 times Belkins' 2025 average, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Smartlead and Belkins data.
How we calculated it: Smartlead median sender 0.74% (replies per contact, senders with 500+ emails). Belkins average 0.45% (replies per email sent, 2025). 0.74 / 0.45 = 1.64. The two use different denominators: replies per contact counts each person once, replies per email counts every follow-up as a send.
| Sender group | Reply rate | Contacts per reply |
|---|---|---|
| Top 5% | 3.85% | 26 |
| Top 10% | 2.63% | 38 |
| Top 25% | 1.43% | 70 |
| Median | 0.74% | 135 |
| Bottom 25% | 0.37% | 270 |
| Bottom 10% | 0.16% or lower | 625 or more |
Cold email statistics by industry, company size, job title and country
Belkins splits its 2025 reply rates by the recipient's industry, company size, seniority and country. These are the only free splits of this kind with a stated sample.
Company size is the clearest pattern. People at firms with up to 10 employees replied to 0.72% of cold emails. At firms with 10,000 or more employees the rate was 0.22%, less than half the overall average. Each step up in size brought the rate down or kept it level. Founders and owners replied most often, at 0.57%, ahead of C-level executives at 0.42% and vice presidents at 0.32%. Small firms often have no assistant or procurement team between the sender and the decision maker.
Industry spreads are wider still. Food and beverage stood out at 3.47%, followed by education at 1.37% and government at 1.21%. Banking was lowest at 0.18%, with insurance at 0.23%. By our calculation the best industry beat the worst by 19 times. Belkins' own text describes the gap as almost 10 times, which does not match the values in its charts. Belkins' list of top industries only includes sectors with at least 20,000 emails sent.
By country, Poland led at 1.43% on 46,000 emails. The United States, with over 5.6 million emails, sat at 0.51%, and the UK at 0.48%. These splits show where Belkins' clients sent and who answered. They do not prove that a country or industry is easier for every sender, because the offers and lists differ by segment.
Source: Belkins, What are B2B cold email response rates? (June 2026). Employees at the recipient company, 7,530,489 emails sent in 2025.
-
Food and beverage had the highest B2B cold email reply rate of any industry in 2025, at 3.47%, according to Belkins.
-
Education had a B2B cold email reply rate of 1.37% in 2025, second among industries, according to Belkins.
-
Banking had the lowest B2B cold email reply rate of any industry in 2025, at 0.18%, according to Belkins.
-
The best industry for B2B cold email replies beat the worst by 19 times in 2025, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Belkins data.
How we calculated it: Food and beverage 3.47% reply rate, banking 0.18% (from Belkins charts of the highest and lowest industries; the highest list is limited to industries with at least 20,000 emails). 3.47 / 0.18 = 19.3. Belkins' own text calls the gap between the best and worst sectors almost 10x, which does not match its charts.
-
People at companies with 0 to 10 employees replied to 0.72% of B2B cold emails in 2025, according to Belkins.
-
People at companies with 10,000+ employees replied to 0.22% of B2B cold emails in 2025, according to Belkins.
-
People at companies with up to 10 employees replied to B2B cold emails at 3.3 times the rate of people at 10,000+ employee firms in 2025, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Belkins data.
How we calculated it: 0 to 10 employees 0.72% reply rate, 10,000+ employees 0.22%. 0.72 / 0.22 = 3.27.
-
People at 10,000+ employee firms replied to B2B cold emails at less than half the overall average rate in 2025, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Belkins data.
How we calculated it: 10,000+ employees 0.22% reply rate, all campaigns 0.45%. 0.22 / 0.45 = 0.489, or 49% of the average.
-
Founders and owners replied to 0.57% of B2B cold emails in 2025, the highest of any seniority group, according to Belkins.
-
C-level executives replied to 0.42% of B2B cold emails in 2025, according to Belkins.
-
Vice presidents replied to 0.32% of B2B cold emails in 2025, the lowest of any seniority group, according to Belkins.
-
Cold emails to Poland had a 1.43% reply rate in 2025, the highest of any country, according to Belkins.
-
Cold emails to the United States had a 0.51% reply rate in 2025, across 5.6 million+ emails, according to Belkins.
-
Cold emails to the United Kingdom had a 0.48% reply rate in 2025, according to Belkins.
-
Cold emails to Canada had a 0.63% reply rate in 2025, across 266,000 emails, according to Belkins.
-
Cold emails to Poland drew 2.8 times the reply rate of cold emails to the United States in 2025, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Belkins data.
How we calculated it: Poland 1.43% across 46,000 emails, United States 0.51% across 5.6 million+ emails. 1.43 / 0.51 = 2.80.
| Industry | Reply rate | Group |
|---|---|---|
| Food and beverage | 3.47% | Highest |
| Education | 1.37% | Highest |
| Government | 1.21% | Highest |
| Museums and cultural institutions | 1.17% | Highest |
| Non-profit | 1.03% | Highest |
| Construction | 0.60% | Middle |
| Financial services | 0.59% | Middle |
| Healthcare | 0.58% | Middle |
| Legal services | 0.56% | Middle |
| Retail | 0.33% | Lowest |
| Pharmaceutical | 0.30% | Lowest |
| Accounting | 0.24% | Lowest |
| Insurance | 0.23% | Lowest |
| Banking | 0.18% | Lowest |
Cold email follow-up statistics
Every follow-up earns fewer replies than the email before it. Added together, follow-ups still bring in about half or more of all replies.
Both vendors show the same shape. In Smartlead data the first email earned 1.18%, the second 0.73% and the seventh 0.33%, a fall of 72%. In Belkins data step 1 earned 0.59% and step 6 earned 0.28%, a fall of 53%. Belkins saw a small rise at step 4, to 0.34% from 0.30% at step 3. Yet the typical Smartlead sequence stops at 3 emails, and the bottom 10% of senders send only one.
Replies are not the same as meetings. Follow-ups brought in 58.6% of Belkins replies, and the third email alone booked 35.6% of email-sourced meetings. Steps 3 to 5 together drove 53.5% of meetings. Gong's data puts the cost of a meeting in plain terms. The average rep sent 344 cold emails per meeting, or about 0.29% of emails, by our calculation. Top 10% reps booked 8.1 times more meetings than average.
Email is not the only follow-up channel. Belkins' cold calls connected with 18.6% of prospects reached, and calling produced 33.6% of its appointments, against 50% for email. Gong found that pitching the product in a cold email cut reply rates by up to 57%. For the wider email channel, see our B2B email marketing statistics.
Sources: Smartlead, Do cold email follow-ups work? (850M+ emails); Belkins, Sales follow-up statistics in B2B (June 2026, 7,530,489 emails in 2025). The two use different denominators.
-
The first email in a cold email sequence earned a 1.18% reply rate in 2026, according to Smartlead.
-
The second email in a cold email sequence earned a 0.73% reply rate in 2026, 62% of the first email's rate, according to Smartlead.
-
The seventh email in a cold email sequence still earned a 0.33% reply rate in 2026, one reply per 303 contacts, according to Smartlead.
-
Cold email reply rates fell 72% from the first email to the seventh email of a sequence in 2026, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Smartlead data.
How we calculated it: Email 1 reply rate 1.18%, email 7 reply rate 0.33%. (1.18 - 0.33) / 1.18 = 0.720, or 72%.
-
The typical cold email sequence ran 3 emails in 2026, and the bottom 10% of senders sent just one, according to Smartlead.
-
The first email in a B2B cold email sequence had a 0.59% reply rate in 2025, the highest of any step, according to Belkins.
-
B2B cold email reply rates fell 53% from step 1 to step 6 of a sequence in 2025, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Belkins data.
How we calculated it: Step 1 reply rate 0.59%, step 6 reply rate 0.28% (Belkins chart). (0.59 - 0.28) / 0.59 = 0.525, or 53%.
-
The third email in a B2B cold email sequence booked 35.6% of all email-sourced meetings in 2025, according to Belkins.
-
Steps 3 to 5 of B2B cold email sequences drove 53.5% of all email-sourced meetings in 2025, according to Belkins.
-
Cold calls connected with 18.6% of prospects reached in 2025, against a 0.45% reply rate for email, according to Belkins.
-
Belkins booked over 1,200 appointments from 7.5 million cold emails sent in 2025, according to Belkins.
-
The average sales rep sent 344 cold emails to land one meeting, according to a 2025 Gong analysis of 28 million+ cold emails.
-
About 0.29% of cold emails sent by the average sales rep booked a meeting in 2025, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Gong data.
How we calculated it: Gong reports 344 cold emails per meeting for the average rep. 1 / 344 = 0.00291, or 0.29% of emails.
-
The top 10% of sales reps booked 8.1 times more meetings from cold email than the average rep, according to a 2025 Gong analysis.
-
The top 25% of sales reps booked 4.3 times more meetings from cold email than the average rep, according to a 2025 Gong analysis.
-
Top sales reps got 4.2 times more cold email replies than average reps, according to a 2025 Gong analysis.
-
Pitching the product cut cold email reply rates by up to 57%, according to a 2025 Gong analysis of 28 million+ cold emails.
| Emails in sequence | Replies per 1,000 contacts | Share of replies from follow-ups |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | 0% |
| 2 | 19 | 38% |
| 3 | 25 | 52% |
| 4 | 30 | 60% |
| 5 | 33 | 65% |
| 7 | 40 | 71% |
Cold email bounce rate and deliverability benchmarks
A bounced email cannot earn a reply, and high bounce rates hurt the sender's reputation with mailbox providers. Smartlead publishes the only free bounce benchmark with a stated sample.
The median cold email sender bounced 1.54% of emails. A quarter of senders bounced 3.21% or more, above the 2% line that Smartlead calls the danger point. List quality is the main lever. Every bounced address is a contact who cannot reply.
Sending setup also lines up with results. Senders with SPF, DKIM and DMARC records needed 108 contacts per reply, against 120 without them. Gmail senders needed about 90 contacts per reply, Outlook senders 120 and custom mail servers 179. Smartlead warns that this compares different senders, not the same emails sent from each provider, so the provider may not be the cause.
Volume per mailbox is modest. The typical mailbox sent about 14 cold emails a day, and the typical account spread its sending across 20 mailboxes. Senders also waited less before launching, 8.0 days from setup to first campaign against 9.4 a year earlier.
Source: Smartlead, The State of Cold Email 2026 and Gmail vs Outlook benchmark. Lower is better. Provider and authentication groups overlap.
-
The typical cold email sender had a bounce rate of 1.54% in 2026, according to Smartlead.
-
A quarter of cold email senders had a bounce rate of 3.21% or higher in 2026, above the 2% danger line, according to Smartlead.
-
Cold email senders with SPF, DKIM and DMARC set up needed 108 contacts per reply in 2026, against 120 for unverified senders, according to Smartlead.
-
Cold email senders on Gmail needed about 90 contacts per reply in 2026, against 120 on Outlook and 179 on custom servers, according to Smartlead.
-
Cold emails sent from custom mail servers had a reply rate of 0.56% in 2026, against 1.11% for Gmail and 0.83% for Outlook, according to Smartlead.
-
The typical mailbox sent about 14 cold emails a day in 2026, and the heaviest 10% sent 42, according to Smartlead.
-
The typical Smartlead account ran 20 sending mailboxes in 2026, according to Smartlead.
-
The typical cold email campaign went to 499 people in 2026, and the biggest campaigns passed 5,700, according to Smartlead.
-
Cold email senders waited a typical 8.0 days from setup to their first campaign in 2026, down from 9.4 a year earlier, according to Smartlead.
| Sending provider | Contacts per reply | Reply rate |
|---|---|---|
| Gmail | 90 | 1.11% |
| Outlook | 120 | 0.83% |
| Custom servers | 179 | 0.56% |
Best time to send cold emails
Smartlead and Belkins both find that morning sends do best. Neither finds that the day of the week matters much.
Smartlead's reply rates peaked at 1.34% for emails sent around 7am in the recipient's time zone. Belkins saw its best results between 8am and noon, at 0.54%, and its worst late in the evening and at night, at 0.40%. That reverses Belkins' earlier studies, which favoured late evening sends.
The day matters far less than the hour. Smartlead's daily reply rates sat between 0.82% and 0.91%, so the best day beat the worst by only 11%. Belkins found Wednesday and Thursday best among working days at 0.48% each. Its high Sunday figure came from very low volume and is not a reliable signal.
Replies come fast. 64% arrived within an hour of sending and 88.5% within 24 hours. Length matters more than timing. First emails under 50 words earned 1.47%, while emails of 100 to 149 words earned 1.03%, the weakest band.
-
Cold email reply rates peaked at 1.34% for emails sent around 7am in the recipient's time zone in 2026, according to Smartlead.
-
Cold email reply rates ranged only from 0.82% to 0.91% across the days of the week in 2026, according to Smartlead.
-
The best day of the week for cold email replies beat the worst by only 11% in 2026, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Smartlead data.
How we calculated it: Day-of-week reply rates ranged from 0.82% (lowest day) to 0.91% (highest day). 0.91 / 0.82 = 1.110, an 11% difference. For comparison, the 7am peak of 1.34% is well above every daily average.
-
64% of cold email replies arrived within one hour of sending in 2026, according to Smartlead.
-
88.5% of cold email replies arrived within 24 hours of sending in 2026, according to Smartlead.
-
B2B cold emails sent between 8am and noon had a 0.54% reply rate in 2025, the best time slot, according to Belkins.
-
B2B cold emails sent between 8am and noon drew a 35% higher reply rate than late-evening sends in 2025, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Belkins data.
How we calculated it: 8am to noon 0.54%, late evening (8pm to 11pm) and night 0.40%. 0.54 / 0.40 = 1.35, a 35% higher rate.
-
B2B cold emails sent on Wednesdays and Thursdays each had a 0.48% reply rate in 2025, the best working days, according to Belkins.
-
First cold emails under 50 words earned a 1.47% reply rate in 2026, the highest of any length band, according to Smartlead.
-
First cold emails of 100 to 149 words earned a 1.03% reply rate in 2026, the lowest of any length band, according to Smartlead.
-
First cold emails under 50 words earned a 43% higher reply rate than emails of 100 to 149 words in 2026, calculated by StatisticsGlobal from Smartlead data.
How we calculated it: Under 50 words 1.47% reply rate, 100 to 149 words 1.03%. 1.47 / 1.03 = 1.427, a 43% higher rate.
| Finding | Value | Source and year |
|---|---|---|
| Peak reply rate by send hour (7am, recipient's time) | 1.34% | Smartlead, 2026 |
| Range of reply rates by day of week | 0.82% to 0.91% | Smartlead, 2026 |
| Replies arriving within 1 hour | 64% | Smartlead, 2026 |
| Replies arriving within 24 hours | 88.5% | Smartlead, 2026 |
| Reply rate, first emails under 50 words | 1.47% | Smartlead, 2026 |
| Reply rate, sends between 8am and noon | 0.54% | Belkins, 2025 |
| Reply rate, sends between 5am and 8am | 0.52% | Belkins, 2025 |
| Reply rate, late evening and night sends | 0.40% | Belkins, 2025 |
| Reply rate, Wednesday and Thursday | 0.48% | Belkins, 2025 |
How cold email benchmarks are measured, and their limits
All cold email data comes from vendors' own platforms or client campaigns. No official statistics body measures cold email, so every figure on this page reflects one company's customers.
The biggest difference is the denominator. Smartlead divides replies by contacts and reports the median sender, using only senders with at least 500 emails. Belkins divides unique replies by every email sent, excluding auto-replies and bounces, and reports one average for its own agency campaigns. Gong reports multipliers and emails per meeting, not a reply rate. The same campaign can produce very different rates under each method.
Open rates are left out on purpose. Smartlead does not use them because Apple Mail loads images automatically, which triggers open tracking before anyone reads the email. Belkins switched off open tracking in 2025 because the tracking pixel was hurting deliverability. A reply is the only reliable sign that someone read the email.
Other limits apply. Smartlead does not state the period its 2026 figures cover, and Gong does not state its data period. Belkins' sample is weighted to the United States, with over 5.6 million of its 7.5 million emails. Instantly also publishes a cold email benchmark, but it does not state its sample size, so we did not use it. Treat these figures as ranges to compare against, not targets.
| Source | Headline reply figure | Denominator | Sample | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smartlead | 0.74% median sender (135 contacts per reply) | Replies per contact | 850M+ emails, senders with 500+ sends | 2026 report, period not stated |
| Belkins | 0.45% average (about 219 emails per reply) | Replies per email sent | 7,530,489 emails, 34,393 replies | January to December 2025 |
| Gong | 344 emails per meeting for the average rep | Meetings per email | 28M+ cold emails | Not stated (published July 2025) |
Frequently asked questions
What is a good cold email reply rate in 2026?
Anything above 0.74% beats the median Smartlead sender in 2026. 1.43% puts a sender in the top 25% and 2.63% in the top 10%. Belkins' 2025 average was 0.45%, measured per email sent rather than per contact.
How many follow-up emails should a cold email sequence have?
Follow-ups brought in 58.6% of Belkins replies in 2025, and the third email booked the most meetings. Smartlead's step data shows every follow-up up to the seventh still earns replies, though each earns less. Belkins recommends 3 to 5 steps.
Which industries reply most to cold emails?
In Belkins' 2025 data, food and beverage led at 3.47%, followed by education at 1.37% and government at 1.21%. Banking was lowest at 0.18% and insurance at 0.23%.
What is the best time to send a cold email?
In the morning, in the recipient's time zone. Smartlead found reply rates peak at 1.34% around 7am. Belkins found 8am to noon best at 0.54% in 2025. The day of the week matters far less.
Are cold email reply rates falling compared with last year?
Within 2025, Belkins saw reply rates fall from 0.54% in February to 0.35% in December. Smartlead says its median held steady month to month. Belkins' older, higher figures used a different denominator, so they cannot be compared directly.
Why do cold email benchmarks differ so much between reports?
Vendors divide by different things. Smartlead counts replies per contact and uses the median sender. Belkins counts replies per email sent. Some reports divide by opens, which inflates the rate. Always check the denominator before comparing.
Sources
- Smartlead, The State of Cold Email 2026: cold email statistics and benchmarks, 2026, period not stated, accessed 31 October 2026. Link · Saved data copy
- Belkins, What are B2B cold email response rates? Belkins' 2026 study, 26 June 2026, accessed 31 October 2026. Link · Saved data copy
- Belkins, Sales follow-up statistics in B2B: Belkins' 2026 study, 26 June 2026, accessed 31 October 2026. Link · Saved data copy
- Gong, Does cold email even work any more? Here's what the data says, 24 July 2025, updated 27 May 2026, accessed 31 October 2026. Link · Saved data copy
- Smartlead, Cold email response rate: benchmarks by percentile, 2026, accessed 31 October 2026. Link · Saved data copy
- Smartlead, Do cold email follow-ups work? Reply rate by step, 2026, accessed 31 October 2026. Link · Saved data copy
- Smartlead, Gmail vs Outlook for cold email: cold email replies by sending provider, 2026, accessed 31 October 2026. Link · Saved data copy
- Smartlead, How long should a cold email be? Reply rate by length, 2026, accessed 31 October 2026. Link · Saved data copy
Changes to this page
- : First published.